'Dirty tricks'
muddy citizen petitions
By KENRIC WARD
Published:
2 July 2008
The Treasure Coast Palm
On Tuesday, two “emergency
rules” went into effect in Florida. They
were invoked, the Secretary of State’s Office says, due to “an
immediate danger to the public health, safety or welfare.”
Scary stuff? Indeed. The emergency rules — as much as the
“danger”
they identify — pose a threat to the health, safety and welfare of
democracy in this state.
Both orders stem from Senate Bill 866, an election bill passed
by the 2008 Legislature.
The first directive (1SER08-2) deletes a requirement that
county
supervisors of election record verified petition signatures on
initiative petitions in the statewide voter registration system. The
order contains a stunning admission by Secretary of State Kurt Browning:
“Discrepancies have existed in the numbers of signatures being
verified in the statewide voter registration system for initiative
petitions. These discrepancies seriously undermined the reliability of
the number of signatures recorded. The secretary of state lacks
confidence in the accuracy of signature verification numbers.”
Translation: The state openly admits its procedure for
verifying
signatures and validating petitions is error-prone and wholly
unreliable. This official acknowledgement is as damning as any
complaints from Florida Hometown Democracy or other citizen groups
attempting to get constitutional amendments before the voters.
“This should get us on the ballot,” says Lesley Blackner,
president
of Hometown Democracy, which claims to have submitted 820,000 petition
signatures. A total of 611,000 are needed to qualify for the November
election.
At last report, the state had tallied 592,561 FHD signatures.
Yet
the state’s numbers have been in question ever since the election
division abruptly stopped posting updated figures weeks before the Feb.
1 filing deadline. Officials said their computers crashed.
Tallahassee’s admission of a faulty verification system
undermines
the state’s “official” tally and leaves everyone guessing as to what
the real numbers are. Now the secretary has rushed new rules into
effect by executive fiat — without hearings and without a recount.
If you think that’s surreal, check out Browning’s second
emergency order, 1SER08-3.
Expanding the state’s signature revocation law (also in
SB866), the
administrative order implements a new “standard” revocation form.
Again, Browning determined that the “health, safety or welfare” of
Floridians required immediate action.
But there’s a big problem here, too. In their rush, the
Legislature
and the secretary failed to heed the state’s 1st District Court of
Appeal, which struck down the revocation process altogether — back on
April 22.
In its unanimous ruling, the court declared revocation
unconstitutional. The justices affirmed that the Florida Constitution
gives citizens the right to propose amendments without legislative
“assistance” — or interference.
By continuing to toy with the petition process and, now,
blatantly
flouting the law, legislators and the secretary of state exhibit what
Blackner brands “incompetence and dirty tricks.”
That Florida’s elected and appointed officials use “emergency
rules”
to undermine the constitutional right to petition is bad enough. This
is the dirty tricks part. Even more pernicious is the system’s failure
to do its job.
“The state’s mechanism for handling ballot petitions clearly
hasn’t
kept up,” says Blackner, whose crew has observed chaotic counting
operations at supervisors of elections offices from Miami and
Pensacola. “We’re still running Florida like it’s a little agricultural
state of 3 million people.”
Amid officials’ admitted confusion and their extra-legal
connivance,
visions of Little Haiti come to mind. And as Haitians well know, a
democracy without agreed-upon rules and standards is no democracy at
all.
Charlie Crist got things rolling downhill when he signed
SB866. Where are you now, governor?
ken.ward@scripps.com |